Cars are a cornerstone of daily life in the UK, and the government benefits significantly from this reliance. From taxes on car ownership and fuel to the upcoming plan to charge electric vehicle drivers by distance traveled, cars are a lucrative source of revenue.
Yet, the nation’s heavy dependence on automobiles comes at a high economic cost. Congestion and traffic inefficiencies alone cost the UK economy an estimated £7.5 billion annually in lost time, while maintaining and repairing worn-out roads could require up to £17 billion.
Over the past three decades, the UK population has grown by 19%, while the number of cars on the roads has surged by 56%. Outside London, 81% of households own at least one car, highlighting the country’s deep-rooted car dependency.
Read More: Venezuela’s Maduro Confirms ‘Cordial’ Call with Trump Amid Rising Tensions
The Cost of Car-Centric Urban Design
Fitting millions of vehicles into a relatively small country has given driving priority over other forms of transport. Comparatively, public transit access in the UK lags far behind other European nations:
- Germany: 90% of urban residents have access to trams or underground systems.
- France: 80%
- UK: Less than 20%, a level comparable to the US, despite the UK’s higher population density.
Unlike the US, where new roads can regularly ease congestion, the UK must contend with high population density, similar to the Netherlands, combined with urban transport infrastructure more typical of low-density areas like Texas.
This lack of robust public transport carries hidden costs. Councils spend £2.3 billion annually transporting 470,000 children to school, primarily via taxis, while subsidies for 800,000 motability vehicles—one in five new cars sold in 2024—further strain public finances. While these expenditures support essential services, the UK has effectively become a nation where only cars can deliver them.
Lessons from Other Countries
Urban transport is ultimately a matter of policy choices.
Singapore: Limiting Cars, Boosting Transit
Singapore maintains just 146 cars per 1,000 people through strict regulations, including costly ten-year certificates of entitlement and congestion charges. The outcome: a fast, reliable, and affordable public transport system. Traffic flows smoothly, buses and trains operate efficiently, and car owners help subsidize the system.
The Netherlands: Reclaiming Streets for People
In the 1970s, Dutch cities faced dangerous, car-dominated streets. Public protests led to city redesigns prioritizing pedestrians, cyclists, and public transport. Research shows that reducing space for cars slows traffic, accelerates public transit, and makes walking and cycling safer. As more people switch to public transport, it becomes faster and more reliable, attracting even those who previously relied solely on cars.
Pathways for the UK
For the UK to emulate Singapore, drivers must pay significantly more for car use. To follow the Dutch example, authorities would need to reclaim urban space from vehicles. England, with its high population density and historical roots in railways and tram systems, is ideally suited to public transport.
Yet outside London—the only city where most households can manage without a car—public transit remains underdeveloped. Elsewhere, cars dominate, leading to clogged high streets, crowded parking, and long commutes.
Economic Risks of Inaction
The Local Government Association describes the UK as a “country in a jam,” where productivity suffers due to car congestion. Without intervention, time lost on the roads is projected to increase by 27% in the coming decades.
Transitioning to a system where cars are not the fastest or most convenient mode of transport will require vision and bold policy decisions. But failing to act risks perpetuating a costly dependence that hampers the UK economy.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is the UK so reliant on cars?
Limited public transport outside London and car-focused urban design make cars essential.
How much does traffic congestion cost?
Around £7.5 billion per year in lost time, plus £17 billion to repair roads.
How does the UK compare internationally?
Less than 20% of urban residents have access to trams or underground trains, far below Germany (90%) and France (80%).
What are the hidden public costs of cars?
Councils spend £2.3 billion on school transport and subsidize 800,000 motability vehicles.
Can public transport be improved by reducing cars?
Yes—less car space speeds up buses and trains, making walking, cycling, and transit safer and faster.
What solutions exist?
Charge more for car use, reclaim urban space for public transport, and expand transit outside London.
Conclusion
The UK’s dependence on cars is more than a convenience—it is an economic drag. Congested roads, high maintenance costs, and limited public transport outside London hinder productivity and inflate public spending. Other countries, from Singapore to the Netherlands, demonstrate that reducing car reliance and investing in efficient, reliable transit systems can transform urban mobility and boost economic performance.
